Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-4670S - 166 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $55.26 vs $225.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-10700F - $0.35 vs $1.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
25.735294117647058%
Price, $
$225.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361889 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
157
94.57831325301204%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361889 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1151
71.40198511166254%
Multi-Core
3254
45.0006914672936%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |