Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than Core i9-10900F - 188 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $240.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 7% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-10900F - $1.28 vs $1.38 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
94.68085106382979%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
92.75362318840581%
Price, $
$244.77
98%
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353931 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353931 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
72.33491583944756%
Multi-Core
8426
83.21975308641976%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |