Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF and the cheaper Core i9-10900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $244.77 vs $283.35
- Up to 13% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10900KF - $1.36 vs $1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10900F - 181 vs 180 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
99%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280360 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
86%
Price, $
$283.35
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |