Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than Core i7-920 - 206 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $90.0 vs $205.5
- Up to 52% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-10700KF - $0.48 vs $1.0 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $205.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
189
91.74757281553399%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
24.41176470588235%
Multi-Core
1434
17.740937770629717%
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |