Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Overwatch 2 than Athlon 3000G - 375 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $63.83 vs $202.98
- Up to 65% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-11700F - $0.19 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
375
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
35.18518518518518%
Price, $
$202.98
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $202.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360994 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
333
88.8%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360995 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
45.54973821989529%
Multi-Core
1975
22.468714448236632%
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |