Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-11700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-11700K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 64% better in Starfield than FX-8350 - 72 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 20% better value when playing Starfield than FX-8350 - $3.35 vs $4.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-11700K - $185.0 vs $241.05
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$241.05
76%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $241.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349449 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
44
61.111111111111114%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
79.76190476190476%
Price, $
$185
100%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349449 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |