Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 3349 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 25% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240 - 212 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-12700K - $41.0 vs $253.44
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-12700K - $0.24 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $253.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362313 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
170
80.18867924528303%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
21.888581588305016%
Multi-Core
1137
8.302906382357236%
Intel Core i7-12700K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |