Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Valheim than Celeron G4900 - 230 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $50.0 vs $369.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700KF - $0.26 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
16.149068322981368%
Price, $
$369.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362607 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
191
83.04347826086956%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362606 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
21.337028056806375%
Multi-Core
1051
5.969555833238668%
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |