Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $50.0 vs $283.35
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.34 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 36% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G4900 - 198 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
73.73737373737373%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348800 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
23.77622377622378%
Price, $
$283.35
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
34.94044242768009%
Multi-Core
1051
11.481319641686696%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |