Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Celeron G4900

3.1 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900

Buy for $50 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348795 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

3.4 GHz | 8-core

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Logo
AMD Ryzen™ 7 5800X3D 8-core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor with AMD 3D V-Cache™ Technology

Buy for $294 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348796 minutes ago

Intel Celeron G4900

3.1 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900

Buy for $50 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348795 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

3.4 GHz | 8-core

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Logo
AMD Ryzen™ 7 5800X3D 8-core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor with AMD 3D V-Cache™ Technology

Buy for $294 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348796 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 1478 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900

  • Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $50.0 vs $294.0
  • Up to 80% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $0.45 vs $2.28 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 54 vs 105 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

  • Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G4900 - 129 vs 112 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Elden Ring.

Elden Ring

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


FPS

112

86.82170542635659%

Value, $/FPS

$0.45/FPS

100%

Price, $

$50

100%

Value Winner

Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900

Buy for $50 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348795 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Logo
Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022


FPS

129

100%

Value, $/FPS

$2.28/FPS

19.73684210526316%

Price, $

$294

17%

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen™ 7 5800X3D 8-core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor with AMD 3D V-Cache™ Technology

Buy for $294 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348796 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Logo
Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


Single-Core

616

29.459588713534195%

Multi-Core

1051

9.592917123037605%

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Logo
Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022


Single-Core

2091

100%

Multi-Core

10956

100%

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo

Intel Celeron G4900

vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Apr 3rd, 2018Release Date
Apr 20th, 2022
CeleronCollectionRyzen 7
Coffee LakeCodenameVermeer
Intel Socket 1151SocketAMD Socket AM4
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
8
2Threads
16
3.1 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.4 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.5 GHz
54 W
TDP105 W
14 nmProcess Size
7 nm
31.0xMultiplier
34.0x
UHD Graphics 610
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Celeron G4900 or Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Elden Ring, 1920 x 1080, Maximum

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.