Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2700K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2700K is 365 days older than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 8% better in War Thunder than FX-8320 - 140 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than FX-8320 - $82.0 vs $102.02
- Up to 24% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-8320 - $0.59 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280384 minutes ago
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280385 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |