Buy on Amazon
$319.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3067 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $319.88 vs $450.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 121% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3820 - 62 vs 28 FPS
- Up to 36% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3820 - $7.26 vs $11.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 24 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
28
45.16129032258064%
Value, $/FPS
$11.42/FPS
63.57267950963222%
Price, $
$319.88
100%
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349388 minutes ago
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$450
71%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-core, 24-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349389 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
35.685367264314635%
Multi-Core
2299
22.921236291126622%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
