Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2424 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $319.88 vs $530.0
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 71% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3820 - 48 vs 28 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3820 - $11.04 vs $11.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 24 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
28
58.333333333333336%
Value, $/FPS
$11.42/FPS
96.6725043782837%
Price, $
$319.88
100%
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349265 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
48
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$530
60%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
48.430141287284144%
Multi-Core
2299
30.842500670780787%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |