Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2060 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $199.88 vs $389.88
- Up to 25% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-9700F - $0.76 vs $1.02 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 46% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-4820K - 384 vs 263 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
263
68.48958333333334%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360520 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
384
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
74.50980392156863%
Price, $
$389.88
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360522 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
42.47901872175597%
Multi-Core
2440
39.00255754475703%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |