Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-4820K outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-4820K is 82 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than FX-9590 - 47 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than FX-9590 - $199.88 vs $298.02
- Up to 36% better value when playing Starfield than FX-9590 - $4.25 vs $6.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 130 vs 220 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359842 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
45
95.74468085106383%
Value, $/FPS
$6.62/FPS
64.19939577039275%
Price, $
$298.02
67%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359842 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |