Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5960X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5960X is 1260 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 105 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i7-5960X - $130.0 vs $159.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-5960X - $1.3 vs $1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5960X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
105
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
86.09271523178809%
Price, $
$159
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $159 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354227 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
100
95.23809523809523%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
78.2574568288854%
Multi-Core
2858
38.67911760725403%
Intel Core i7-5960X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell E | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |