Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1358 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 30% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-8120 - 117 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $78.02 vs $150.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i7-6700 - $0.87 vs $1.28 per FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
67.96875%
Price, $
$150
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362345 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
90
76.92307692307693%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |