Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 345 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than Pentium G3250 - 190 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $61.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-6700 - $0.38 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
48.10126582278481%
Price, $
$150
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362077 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
159
83.6842105263158%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
576
44.5475638051044%
Multi-Core
981
23.695652173913043%
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |