Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1366 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Core i3-3240 - 224 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $41.0 vs $108.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i7-6800K - $0.19 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
224
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
39.583333333333336%
Price, $
$108
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361043 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
214
95.53571428571429%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
45.26143790849673%
Multi-Core
1137
20.084790673025967%
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |