Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1128 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 5% better in HITMAN 3 than FX-6350 - 198 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $100.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i7-6900K - $0.53 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
72.6027397260274%
Price, $
$145
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350020 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
188
94.94949494949495%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350019 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |