Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1424 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 22% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-6950X - 60 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $150.0 vs $651.07
- Up to 81% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-6950X - $2.5 vs $13.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
49
81.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$13.29/FPS
18.811136192626034%
Price, $
$651.07
23%
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |