Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2409 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6950X - 206 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $147.99 vs $651.07
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6950X - $0.72 vs $3.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 60 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
184
89.32038834951457%
Value, $/FPS
$3.54/FPS
20.338983050847457%
Price, $
$651.07
22%
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348914 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$147.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |