Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900 is 2044 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6950X - 145 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $458.0 vs $651.07
- Up to 35% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6950X - $3.16 vs $4.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
134
92.41379310344827%
Value, $/FPS
$4.86/FPS
65.02057613168725%
Price, $
$651.07
70%
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349336 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$458
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1295
52.365547917509105%
Multi-Core
8447
64.75774302361239%
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |