Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-6950X vs Core i9-13900

Core i7-6950X vs Core i9-13900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Core i7-6950X

3.0 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i7-6950X Logo
Intel BX80671I76950X Boxed Core i7-6950X Processor Extreme Edition (25M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz) 3.0 10

Buy for $651.07 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280458 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel Core i9-13900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz

Buy for $567.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280457 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-6950X

3.0 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i7-6950X Logo
Intel BX80671I76950X Boxed Core i7-6950X Processor Extreme Edition (25M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz) 3.0 10

Buy for $651.07 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280458 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel Core i9-13900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz

Buy for $567.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280457 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2409 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900

  • Performs up to 20% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-6950X - 207 vs 173 FPS
  • Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $567.98 vs $651.07
  • Up to 27% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-6950X - $2.74 vs $3.76 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 65 vs 140 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6950X - 32 vs 20 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of No Man's Sky.

No Man's Sky

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-6950X Logo
Core i7-6950X

Desktop • May 31st, 2016


FPS

173

83%

Value, $/FPS

$3.76/FPS

72%

Price, $

$651.07

87%

Intel BX80671I76950X Boxed Core i7-6950X Processor Extreme Edition (25M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz) 3.0 10

Buy for $651.07 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280458 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

207

100%

Value, $/FPS

$2.74/FPS

100%

Price, $

$567.98

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i9-13900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz

Buy for $567.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280457 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-6950X Logo
Core i7-6950X

Desktop • May 31st, 2016

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-6950X Logo
Core i7-6950X

Desktop • May 31st, 2016


Single-Core

1295

47%

Multi-Core

8447

51%

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2714

100%

Multi-Core

16426

100%

Intel Core i7-6950X Logo

Intel Core i7-6950X

vs
Intel Core i9-13900 Logo

Intel Core i9-13900

May 31st, 2016Release Date
Jan 4th, 2023
Core i7CollectionCore i9
Broadwell-ECodenameRaptor Lake
Intel Socket 2011-3SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
10Cores
24
20Threads
32
3.0 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.0 GHz
3.5 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.6 GHz
140 WTDP
65 W
14 nmProcess Size
10 nm
30.0x
Multiplier20.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Yes
OverclockableNo

Builds Using Core i7-6950X or Core i9-13900

No Man's Sky, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.