Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 855 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $530.0 vs $651.07
- Up to 19% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-6950X - $3.12 vs $3.83 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6950X - 24 vs 20 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.83/FPS
81.4621409921671%
Price, $
$651.07
81%
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353958 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$530
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353958 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
98.37837837837839%
Multi-Core
7454
88.24434710548124%
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |