Buy on Amazon
$167
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 and the cheaper Core i3-7100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-7100 - 131 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - $70.0 vs $167.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-7700 - $0.54 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
42.51968503937008%
Price, $
$167
41%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W
Buy for $167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349869 minutes ago
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
129
98.47328244274809%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-7100 7th Gen Core Desktop Processor 3M Cache,3.90 GHz (BX80677I37100)
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349869 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
89.77681785457163%
Multi-Core
2440
54.7085201793722%
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
