Buy on Amazon
$375
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1707 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 11% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-8350 - 219 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $185.0 vs $375.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i7-7820X - $0.94 vs $1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
54.97076023391813%
Price, $
$375
49%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-7820X X-Series Processor 8 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350195 minutes ago
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
197
89.95433789954338%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD8350FRHKWOX FX-8350 Octa-core (8 Core) 4 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4.20 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 125 W (AMDFD8350FRHKWOX)
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
