Buy on Amazon
$375
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 2848 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 136% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-750 - 52 vs 22 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $75.0 vs $375.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-7820X - $3.41 vs $7.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.21/FPS
47.295423023578365%
Price, $
$375
20%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-7820X X-Series Processor 8 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348917 minutes ago
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
22
42.30769230769231%
Value, $/FPS
$3.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-750 Quad-Core Desktop Processor (BX80605I5750) 8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, LGA1156
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
427
30.26222537207654%
Multi-Core
1200
15.288571792585042%
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
