Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $48.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 52% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-10400F - $0.41 vs $0.85 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-860 - 132 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 12 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
116
87.87878787878788%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361525 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
48.23529411764706%
Price, $
$112.53
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |