Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 4207 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $48.0 vs $160.68
- Up to 67% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-11600KF - $0.07 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Rocket League than Core i7-860 - 760 vs 673 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 12 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
673
88.55263157894737%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361815 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
760
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
33.333333333333336%
Price, $
$160.68
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361815 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
20.309653916211293%
Multi-Core
1463
16.802572642701275%
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |