Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1620 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield V than FX-6350 - 245 vs 209 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $100.0 vs $192.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-8700K - $0.48 vs $0.78 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
61.53846153846153%
Price, $
$192
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $192 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349336 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
209
85.3061224489796%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |