Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $90.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900K - $0.82 vs $3.92 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-920 - 125 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.92/FPS
20.918367346938773%
Price, $
$490
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
23.727844482561462%
Multi-Core
1434
15.64989632216523%
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |