Buy on Amazon
$260.26
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 13% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-8350 - 223 vs 197 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $185.0 vs $260.26
- Up to 20% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i7-9700 - $0.94 vs $1.17 per FPS
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
223
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
80.34188034188034%
Price, $
$260.26
71%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-9700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.7 GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $260.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350031 minutes ago
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
197
88.34080717488789%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD8350FRHKWOX FX-8350 Octa-core (8 Core) 4 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4.20 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 125 W (AMDFD8350FRHKWOX)
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350030 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
