Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1999 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 25% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-6350 - 152 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $100.0 vs $279.13
- Up to 55% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i7-9700K - $0.82 vs $1.84 per FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
44.565217391304344%
Price, $
$279.13
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $279.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349094 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
122
80.26315789473685%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |