Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 2080 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 38% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6350 - 194 vs 141 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - $100.0 vs $280.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-9700KF - $0.71 vs $1.44 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
49.30555555555555%
Price, $
$280
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
141
72.68041237113401%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |