Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i9-10885H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1376 days newer than Core i9-10885H.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 14% better in God of War than Core i9-10885H - 200 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10885H - 32 vs 16 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10885H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
