Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1155 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $195.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 10% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i7-10700F - $0.72 vs $0.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Apex Legends than Ryzen 7 1700 - 283 vs 271 FPS
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
271
95.75971731448763%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353908 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
283
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
89.99999999999999%
Price, $
$225.99
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1005
62.344913151364764%
Multi-Core
5100
70.52966394689531%
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |