Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K and the cheaper Core i9-10900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $244.77 vs $247.71
- Up to 1% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-10700K - $0.98 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than Core i9-10900F - 250 vs 249 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
249
99.6%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353962 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
250
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
98.98989898989899%
Price, $
$247.71
98%
FPS Winner
Buy for $247.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353962 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |