Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 938 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8400 - 194 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $140.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - $0.75 vs $2.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.53/FPS
29.64426877470356%
Price, $
$490
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348541 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
186
95.87628865979381%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348541 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1353
77.35849056603774%
Multi-Core
4748
51.817090472552664%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |