Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-3550 - 138 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $335.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10900K - $2.6 vs $3.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.55/FPS
73.23943661971832%
Price, $
$490
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359732 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
129
93.47826086956522%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$335
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359731 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
639
36.53516295025729%
Multi-Core
1896
20.69191312888792%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i5-3550 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |