Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-960 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3845 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-960.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 72% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-960 - 412 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-960 - $1.19 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-960 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-960 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-960 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-960
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $299.0 vs $490.0
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
412
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$490
61%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359739 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
FPS
240
58.252427184466015%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
95.19999999999999%
Price, $
$299
100%
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Single-Core
491
28.073184676958263%
Multi-Core
1663
18.14907781294336%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i7-960 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 20th, 2009 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |