Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900KF - 69 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $113.0 vs $283.35
- Up to 64% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900KF - $1.64 vs $4.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
91.30434782608695%
Value, $/FPS
$4.5/FPS
36.44444444444444%
Price, $
$283.35
39%
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348326 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |