Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1509 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Core i3-6100 - 61 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $100.0 vs $615.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900X - $1.82 vs $10.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.08/FPS
18.055555555555554%
Price, $
$615
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349601 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
55
90.1639344262295%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349601 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
75.76142131979695%
Multi-Core
2336
24.927969266887203%
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i3 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |