Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield V than FX-8350 - 246 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 36 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - $185.0 vs $1200.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-10980XE - $0.89 vs $4.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 125 vs 165 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
246
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.88/FPS
18.237704918032787%
Price, $
$1200
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349693 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
209
84.95934959349594%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349692 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 8 |
36 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |