Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 12% better in Rocket League than FX-8120 - 756 vs 672 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $78.02 vs $270.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-11900 - $0.12 vs $0.36 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
756
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
33.33333333333333%
Price, $
$270
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361934 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
672
88.88888888888889%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |