Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 31% better in Minecraft than Core i5-2400S - 794 vs 604 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $70.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-11900 - $0.12 vs $0.34 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
794
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
35.29411764705882%
Price, $
$270
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361342 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
604
76.0705289672544%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361342 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
23.286384976525824%
Multi-Core
1352
15.335753176043557%
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |