Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4130 - 150 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $43.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-11900K - $0.35 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
19.774011299435028%
Price, $
$265
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361981 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
124
82.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361982 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
41.96541543652467%
Multi-Core
1960
17.902813299232736%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |