Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 84% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-6100 - 83 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $100.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-11900K - $2.22 vs $3.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.19/FPS
69.59247648902821%
Price, $
$265
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348554 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
45
54.21686746987952%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348555 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
50.35849852382961%
Multi-Core
2336
21.33723054439167%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |