Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 84% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-7400 - 83 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $110.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-11900K - $2.44 vs $3.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.19/FPS
76.48902821316614%
Price, $
$265
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348670 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
45
54.21686746987952%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
49.59932517924926%
Multi-Core
3232
29.521373766898062%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |