Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than Core i5-7500T - 74 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $69.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-11900K - $1.28 vs $3.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
74
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.58/FPS
35.754189944134076%
Price, $
$265
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
54
72.97297297297297%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1110
46.81568958245466%
Multi-Core
3076
28.096455973693825%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |